SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 387.98+1.3%Nov 28 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: arun gera who wrote (21080)8/11/2007 6:47:38 PM
From: energyplay  Read Replies (2) of 218075
 
I don't think anyplace has a monopoly on smart kids. Look at what is happening now - Smart kids from the US (Google) invest in smart kids in China (Baidu).

If the kid is so smart, why would they sell out their struggling start up cheap to some buyer ?

Look at the Hotmail story, an extremely smart guy from India and a US engineer started a company, successfully deal with Venture Capitalists, and then held out as Microsoft had to bid more and more and more ...until they got a price of 500 million.

****

Japan has managed to significantly reduce the effectiveness of their innovators. I don't think China will go that direction.

Russia and various parts of Europe have made innovation more difficult, and these people sometimes go somewhere else.

As TJ has pointed out, Singapore does something that makes people more risk adverse, so that there is far less innovation coming from Singapore than demographics and education would indicate.

I expect China will have a large group of thinkers and inventors, as will India.

People from the Mumbai area tell me that they are more creative and more enterprising than people in other parts of India...;-)

Is that true ? If so, why ?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext