Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 177.78

-2.2%

Jan 9 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Stan who wrote (67538)	8/13/2007 11:25:13 AM
From: seti	Read Replies (1) of 197157

The question remains is whether he is truly "taking the fall" for company people who withheld information from him, or whether he is, in fact, the culprit who made the decision to withhold the information. The resignation tends to make one believe it was the latter. Frankly, it is my hope that this is the case because the company must move forward with its current leadership and I would like to believe it is on the same high moral level that was in place when Irwin was CEO. Only the insiders know for sure. My thinking is that in a large company, each person only knows some pieces. It's the job of manangment and legal (in court cases) to dig out and piece together all aspects of the story. If for example qcom legal comes asking some engineer about whether he attended some meeting, I see little reason for that engineer to conceal, unless legal gave strong hints on what answer they wanted or never bothered to ask.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next