SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New QUALCOMM - Coming Into Buy Range
QCOM 165.24-2.4%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: manalagi who wrote (788)8/14/2007 2:03:08 PM
From: queuecom  Read Replies (2) of 9132
 
Paul: I have read the Brewster opinion. It seems to me that the first half simply affirms the jury finding of " valid but unenforceable"
The second half launches into the lying by Qualcomm employees and the behaviour of Qualcomm's counsel. He was VERY forceful of his condemnation of this misbehaviour.
He then wrapped up with "hearsay" opinions of Lou Lupin by quoting Balint in the SD paper.

Will Carol Lamm help? Maybe. She will probably appear before Brewster on Aug 29th and may be able to cool him down and refocus on the real issue of the trial, i.e., Q sued and lost - regardless of the late arriving emails.

My opinion is that the 14 lawyers who have been asked to appear will testify under oath. Brewster wants to get to the truth of what happened.

I'll take a crack at estimating the damages that Mq took.

First, Brewster has NO evidence regarding his conclusion that Q wanted to rule the world with these 2 patents. This is his OPINION. No penalty for this - but it give a clue to his dishing out a penalty for the lying.

Unless the 14 lawyers can convince Brewster that Q's people were at fault the they are going to get hammered. Big time. Disbarment? Yes.

Lupin? Lamm will claim that the SD Union misquoted. Lupin was foolish - not illegal. So Brewster's mad. get over it! My opinion - minor sanction to Lupin - unless he gets pinned with purposely withholding the emails. Then disbarment.

Q's witnesses/employees? Clear perjury. They'll get criminal sanctions.

Dollar sanctions against Q. None.

Queuecom

Disclaimer. I am NOT an attorney and it probably shows.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext