SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : PLNI - Game Over
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: rrm_bcnu who wrote (10856)8/14/2007 4:55:32 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (2) of 12518
 
For Jeff to say "If the $100K was indeed returned to Lex Real, the original transfer from Lex Real would have been recorded and that transfer cited by Turek's lawyers. It was not." based soley on Exhibit 4 would mean that he had seen the first 13 pages. How could he get access to that?

I'm real confused about this.

siliconinvestor.com

Yes, you are real confused.

Exhibit 4 shows the money going out to Lex Real. One would think one of the other 13 pages not part of the exhibit would show it going in... and thus would have been cited by Turek's lawyers... and thus the US Trustee (who also has access to the entire bank statement) would not have brought it up. Can you show me any filing or exhibit documenting the money coming in?

As to whether Turek's lawyers "lied" about this, I'd say they just repeated what Turek told them without bothering to verify it. Is that considered lying?

- Jeff
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News