SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : PLNI - Game Over

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: bearclaw51 who wrote (10975)8/14/2007 11:58:09 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (2) of 12518
 
It's called "deductive logic". Look it up.

1. Both Murphy and Turek's lawyers, as well as the US Trustee, have access to Pro-Mold's bank statement. Both Murphy's lawyers and the US Trustee quite clearly say that Turek's $100K wire to Lexreal was a one-way transaction. Why on earth would they say something like this if it could easily be disproved by the bank statement? Why on earth would Turek's lawyers not have presented such obvious refutation evidence if they had it? Simple deductive logic says there is no matching transaction from Lexreal to Pro-Mold, hence Turek had to have been lying.

2. Yes, I am agreeing with the US Trustee that Turek's legal team was negligent at best. Yes, I think Turek's legal team put their reputation at severe risk here. Yes, I think Turek's legal team is so disgraced by this and their handling of concurrent patent suits that they will have no choice but to resign unless Turek replaces them first.

3. I could post on iHub if I so chose. I jus don't feel comfortable getting into a conversation in a place I don't check on a timely basis from day to day.

- Jeff
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext