SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (215714)8/15/2007 9:37:13 AM
From: unclewest  Read Replies (3) of 794003
 
Does anybody think that Al Qaeda blew up a bunch of Yazidis in the back of beyond in Northwest Iraq because they're getting a bad name on the Arab street for killing so many Muslims, so they decided to kill some infidels instead?

They certainly got their headlines. Who can guard every village against a group that thinks killing a bunch of poor people far from the conflict is their success for the day?


No surprise here. This is text book stuff. To have any possibility of getting the support of the population, we must secure areas after we clear them. We went into that area recently...took out some bad guys and left...leaving the population unsecure. That game is called whack-a-mole. It is an exercise in futility. Or worse, it is a formula for failure.

Military literature (old and new) on counterinsurgency, says operating this way will result in massive punishment of the population by the insurgents.

We made a fundamental error of the highest order. The likely result is any remaining Kurd support for us will diminish rapidly in that area.

See US Army - USMC - Counterinsurgency Field Manual, published 2007, with Foreword by General David H Petraeus and Lt. General James F. Amos

Pg 50. "Tactical success means nothing."

Pg 51. Table 1-1 - "Unsuccessful Practices"

The first unsuccessful practice listed is, "Overemphasize killing and capturing the enemy rather than securing and engaging the population."

We should not even operate in areas we cannot control after the tactical combat operation is completed. You will find that in the textbooks too.

Our conventional army looks good on paper. We can always count on them looking good on the paper they write on. That is not difficult to accomplish. Even Enron looked good on their own paper.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext