Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 138.73

+1.8%

1:46 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Stan who wrote (67641)	8/15/2007 9:14:32 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) of 197622

Got on PACER to see whether there are any tea leaves worth reading in the BRCM vs Q case pending in Santa Ana in which the injunction remedy is being considered. None. Zero, zilch, nada. Everything but everything worth reading is sealed and therefore unavailable. Impossible to say anything about that case. Sorry. What a statement by IMJ, huh? Q not working on alternatives and that he knew nothing about the case. One of the reasons I got out of Q [biggest being dead money] is the fact that the litigation ineptitude could have signalled management ineptitude. It's looking inceasingly possible that Q's management team is inexperienced at best and incompetent at worst.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next