SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New QUALCOMM - Coming Into Buy Range
QCOM 155.82-1.3%Jan 23 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Eric L who wrote (936)8/16/2007 2:27:11 PM
From: limtex  Read Replies (1) of 9132
 
EL ... the deadly determination of Qualcomm to achieve its goal of holding hostage an entire industry desiring to practice a mobile wireless standard by insulating its IPR from the standards development process so that the standards development organization would lose the opportunity to mitigate, if not to avoid, Qualcomm’s IPR in the development of the standards.

We have indeed cut to the quick. I have posted a number of times that I see nothing by way of stated evidence in Rudi's judgement to support any of the accusations in that sentance.

If there were anything he could have used to support those accusations he would have used them. He didn't.

The other accusations relating to who was where and who knew what and waht tehy said about those in evidence are another matter. But about the sentance and the accusation above I have seen nothing in the judgement.

"Deadly determination". Extraordinary language. "Holding hostage". Unsupportable.

If that is the main plank of a worry that Q hasn't doen what it needs to do in compliance with normal and accepted practice then I do not beleve it is a worry.

If there is some evidence you can point to in Rudis judgment that supports those far fethed accusation then by all means please point them out but I have been through the judgment several times and can't find any supporting evidence.

Best,

L
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext