SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 161.39-1.9%Jan 15 3:59 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: slacker711 who wrote (67790)8/17/2007 10:36:55 AM
From: bronx  Read Replies (1) of 197227
 
Is this new NOK case the opening move in direct cdma/wcdma challenges? If so, why didn't Q get there first? So far, they've both been bound by non-assertion agreements, but if those have lapsed, Q cannot count on much leverage from the gsm/edge case before the ITC, not if the BRCM video fiasco is any sign. So then the first party to get an ITC cdma/wcdma injunction will have the real leverage, and NOK has been first to file.

For that matter, have the non-assertion agreements really lapsed? the whole extension thing again ... .
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News