Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 159.42

-1.2%

Jan 16 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: slacker711 who wrote (67832)	8/17/2007 1:36:11 PM
From: golfinvestor	Read Replies (1) of 197250

Auh, but you missed the point of my post, it has not been proven. Q says so, I didn't. Do you have access to the past agreements between NOK & QCOM? If NOK is claiming they are "paid up" from some of QCOM's patents, why is it so far fetched to assume QCOM is not paid up for the NOK patents in question? I'm not sure what I believe anymore when it comes to QCOM's license agreements. The jury is still out and will be for sometime.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next