SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Where the GIT's are going
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Alan Smithee who wrote (150215)8/17/2007 8:02:33 PM
From: mph  Read Replies (1) of 225578
 
In the course of some research today, I came across an older case, which contained the following line:

The fifth amended complaint is a plethora of words, a marvel of redundancy and a masterpiece of prolixity

There are some posters around SI [certainly not on the within thread] whose commentary often bears a striking resemblance to said fifth amended complaint....lol

I thought you might enjoy the turn of phrase.

For the masters of trivia, the case is from CA:

Potter v. Richards, 132 Cal.App.2d 380
[Civ. No. 20445. Second Dist., Div. Two. Apr. 19, 1955.]
LLOYD POTTER, Appellant, v. EZRA RICHARDS et al., Defendants; INGLEWOOD GENERAL HOSPITAL, Respondent.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News