Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 159.42

-1.2%

Jan 16 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: rkral who wrote (67879)	8/18/2007 9:46:14 AM
From: slacker711	Read Replies (2) of 197281

The case that was originally filed in the Western Wisconsin district court has now been moved to San Diego. It was Nokia's idea and Qualcomm dropped their opposition. The six patents in Nokia's counterclaim are all different than the ITC patents. ...................................................... Patent 7031687 entitled "Balanced Circuit Arrangement and Method for Linearizing Such an Arrangement". Patent 7151915 entitled "Dual Mode Voltage controlled Oscillator Having Controllable Bias Modes and Power Consumption". Patent 6115593 entitled "Elimination of D.C. Offset and Spurious AM Suppression in a Direct Conversion Receiver". Patent 6292474 entitled "Multi-Frequency Band Multi-Radio Receiver and associated Method having Shared Circuit Elements". Patent 6714091 entitled "VCO with Programmible Output Power". Patent 5898740 entitled "Power Control Method in a Cellular Communication System and a Receiver".

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next