Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 163.60

-0.6%

10:36 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: slacker711 who wrote (67782)	8/18/2007 2:16:47 PM
From: Glider05	Read Replies (2) of 197217

Slacker, What is then your assumption of what an alternative conclusion by an arbitrator of the Q claim of automatic renewal because of shipment continuation by NOK would be? That it is not an automatic renewal, therefore NOK can continue to ship product without paying Q, and that's OK? Just trying to make sense of this, and finding it difficult since none of us has insight into the wording of the contract. The idea that Nokia might have "automatically" renewed their agreement by continuing to ship product seems as ridiculous to me as Nokia's claim that the original agreement covered GPRS/EDGE handsets.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next