Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 159.42

-1.2%

Jan 16 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Art Bechhoefer who wrote (67904)	8/18/2007 2:58:48 PM
From: rkral	Read Replies (1) of 197273

"Does anyone suspect (besides me) that this continuation patent may be invalid, in lieu of the Supreme Court decision in the KSR-Teleflex case? Continuation patents as a group may now be deemed obvious. " Not me. Besides speculation, what is your basis for those statements? "This is the very issue that worries drug firms, who have enthusiastically used minor variations in drugs going off patent protection to prolong their exclusivity." Could we please limit the discussion to utility patents, e.g., in telecommunications and electronics?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next