Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 151.59

-0.4%

Jan 30 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: carranza2 who wrote (67939)	8/18/2007 11:06:01 PM
From: seti	Read Replies (1) of 197444

Don't get me wrong, I love engineers, they're great, but I have found them to be deficient in analyzing legal issues. And I speak from experience, having represented them. A terrific exception was IMJ, but he is unique. I hope he keeps a very active hand in things. Engineers tend to see things in black and white, numerically, and like to pigeonhole issues. This is not how law works. Both sets of professionals have a job to do in IP cases. What would happen if the legal folks got zero input from the engineers? Do you think they would know how to spell CDMA? Most all high level engineering involves careful consideration of tradeoffs, cost/benefit, power/computing budget, schedule/features, superior/cheaper materials etc etc. The best type involves thinking outside of the box "pigeonhole". Your view of engineering is very limited.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next