2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 374.96

+0.2%

Nov 19 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: zamboz who wrote (21420)	8/19/2007 7:40:09 PM
From: Slagle	Read Replies (1) of 217901

Rick, It is nice to find that somebody agrees with me for a change. <grin> Either we shoulder the job of being "world policeman" forever or we stand aside and let the world go its own way. What I think would likely happen is that you would go back to a nuclear version of the multi-polar world that existed before the spectacular rise of the British Empire. You would have regional wars and probably some local nuclear exchanges but for the world this should be very survivable and also instructive. This would help break up dangerous concentrations of power and keep things diffuse and local. I think it would greatly help the environment and slow resource depletion. And to get this wonderful outcome all we have to do is walk away and allow chaos to reign. There is now longer an "Evil Empire" (and it surely was one in its day) so we no longer need to be the "global superpower". Let freedom ring. Slagle

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next