Also, if you look at the link you posted it says:
"(a) Whoever under oath (or in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code) in any proceeding before or ancillary to any court or grand jury of the United States knowingly makes any false material declaration or makes or uses any other information, including any book, paper, document, record, recording, or other material, knowing the same to contain any false material declaration, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both."
The false testimony has to be material. It says so right there in the law. Judge Wright ruled Clinton's testimony was immaterial. Immaterial = no perjury.
If you would ever bother to learn what a Summary Dismissal is you'd see how stupid this line of reasoning your pursuing is.
Get over it, you're wrong on this one.
SD |
