SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New QUALCOMM - Coming Into Buy Range
QCOM 174.01-0.3%Nov 14 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: thinkclear who wrote (1035)8/21/2007 10:57:22 AM
From: carranza2  Read Replies (1) of 9129
 
I have no problem with your calculation. It all depends on how Paul views his cost basis. If he has reduced it to a negative thanks to options, then it is crazy to get rid of the shares.

I am not enough of an accountant to make an informed comment on whether Paul is justified in considering that options have reduced his cost basis. I can see reasons why one would justifiably think so and I can see reasons why one is not.

My gut tells me that the options should not be considered as reducing the cost basis unless he used them to actually buy shares, in which case the negative cost basis is likely non-existent. Still, there is a lot of merit to thinking of Paul's trading in Q as being part of a whole, i.e., a total investment of X dollars in shares and options has resulted in Paul holding Y number of shares which cost a total of $Z and yield .56 a year.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext