Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 152.66

+0.7%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: bronx who wrote (68119)	8/22/2007 9:49:27 AM
From: scratchmyback	Read Replies (2) of 197470

<<To split hairs, is Altman right that both NOK and Q are now infringing?... Let's split some more hairs then. The 2001 agreement expired last April, so neither Nokia nor Qualcomm is infringing that agreement. The fact that Nokia does have an option to renew it is another story, but I think it's impossible to "infringe" an option that hasn't been executed. On the other hand, Nokia is infringing Qualcomm's patents and Qualcomm is infringing Nokia's patents. The question is just what these patents are worth, and how much Nokia and Qualcomm should pay each other. Disclaimer: I am a Nokia-centric euro-nut-socialist-serf non-lawyer

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next