Where the GIT's are going Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Where the GIT's are going

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (150560)	8/23/2007 3:53:33 PM
From: Alan Smithee	Read Replies (2) of 225578

don't most of the people guilty of such behavior get hit with fines? I suspect federal cases involving this are few and far between. The hook had to be interstate transportation of the dogs for gambling purposes. Otherwise, I doubt there is a federal nexus. Normally, it'd be handled on a local level. That said, I think there has been a trend in recent years to give people jail time for really egregious animal abuse issues. I don't think the "private property" angle is particularly apt. My house is my private property, but I still can't commit arson and burn it down. Likewise, I think reasonable laws prohibiting animal abuse are acceptable. Whether jail time is warranted is another question entirely, particularly when you consider that a lot of jails/prisons are overcrowded and there are much more serious offenders who require incarceration. Edit: It appears the Vick indictment is titled: "Conspiracy to Travel in Interstate Commerce in Aid of Unlawful Activities and to Sponsor a Dog in Animal Fighting Venture" thesmokinggun.com It's that pesky Commerce Clause again... Double Edit: Here's one of the statutes at issue: www4.law.cornell.edu

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next