SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New QUALCOMM - Coming Into Buy Range
QCOM 159.42-1.2%Jan 16 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Eric L who wrote (1105)8/24/2007 3:33:58 PM
From: Art Bechhoefer  Read Replies (1) of 9132
 
The Rambus royalties issue is interesting, and so is the EC response. But I don't see enough similarity between this issue before the EC and the Nokia-POS-QUALCOMM issue.

If the issue centers around WCDMA, then it's clear that QCOM did just the opposite of Rambus, insisting to the Europeans that QCOM IPR covered every flavor of WCDMA.

If, as I understand it, the issue is mainly whether QCOM charges a uniformly reasonable royalty rate, then the facts appear to support QCOM on two different grounds:

The royalty rate is less than what certain companies (e.g., Nokia) charge and is consistent with practices supported by the EC.

Licensing is available to all companies, and all but a handful of licensees apparently are satisfied with the arrangement.

Art
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext