Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: KLP who wrote (217123)	8/26/2007 5:48:33 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (4) of 793904

IF I had any respect for O'Donnell, it vaporized with that column. He evidently isn't smart enough to know the difference between killing for food, and killing for the thrill of it. They are still dogs. I can understand banning dog fighting as cruel, but people are talking about this story as if Vicks was torturing children. He killed underperforming dogs! The horror! As far as I know, a dog is an animal and it's legal to kill a dog. People should keep a sense of proportion. If Vicks ate the dogs he killed, would you feel better about it?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next