Re: But you imply that YOU will decide legitimacy (by your definition, any person of colour has legitimacy) or, if you prefer, anyone who fancies to roam around across established borders and take what he can find -- as long as he isn't white....
Don't exaggerate my opinion! I never claimed that (geopolitical) legitimacy was a nonwhite virtue only... For instance, I don't agree with Hispanic protesters calling for deporting white Americans back to Europe --I'm of the opinion that, historically, white settlers in the Americas have earned their legitimacy (as permanent American settlers). Ditto for you, SAn Anglos, who fancy themselves as "African"....
Actually, I could easily fire your argument back at you. You talk about "established borders", now, that's interesting, considering that most, if not all, of the world's borders were drawn up by white colonialists --in Africa, the Middle East, in the Americas, even in Asia (Pakistan/India, among others).
Now, if we stretch your own notion of "established, lawful borders" a bit, we may just end up in a world where whites have ruled that ALL NONWHITE PEOPLES are, one way or another, ILLEGAL. After all, it's just a matter for the white "master race" to spread across the Earth, settling every continent, every island, every stretch of inhabitable land and dividing it all up along "established borders"... The ploy is obvious, if insane: a worldwide, demographic gerrymander of sorts whereby each and every nonwhite people is branded "immigrant" or "illegal" or "trespasser" or "intruder", turning the Earth into a planet where only whites truly belong, where nonwhites are mere spoilers to be pushed around....
Gus |
