Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)

AMD 252.04

+0.3%

Jan 27 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: inex who wrote (239538)	8/30/2007 6:53:56 AM
From: Sarmad Y. Hermiz	Read Replies (1) of 275872

>> Can you explain why you believe it impossible giving similar benchmark comparisons??? on i-hub, tecate posted an article that addresses this. overclockers.com excerpt: "Second, this is especially true for 3DMark 2006, which is primarily a video card, not a CPU benchmark. As you can see here, the percentage increase in 3DMark scores based on increases in CPU frequency isn't 130%, it's less than 30%. For instance, for the quad-cores listed, a frequency increase of 25% yields just a 6% increase in the score. That's a scaling percentage of 24%." ------ benchmark results with different processors, but same graphics. www23.tomshardware.com ------ tecate's post. siliconinvestor.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next