2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 374.33

+0.7%

Nov 18 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: energyplay who wrote (21836)	9/1/2007 6:22:58 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (2) of 217862

EP, thinking through the prospects siliconinvestor.com , and putting a line in the sand, I decided that I will not buy back the duplex in Bay Area for anything more than 40% of what I sold it for in April of 2006, and even when so, the property tax will have to be rolled back from the current 23k per annum back to 6k, else duplex will find me a buyer at 20% of what I sold it for. The way it can all happen is firstly a 50% haircut on nominal price (100 down to 50), and then a close shave by currency devaluation of another 50% (50 down to 25), plus an additional 20% distress bargaining (25 down to 20). Chugs, TJ P.S. Regarding this property loopnet.com that we bp0.blogger.com and bp0.blogger.com and bp0.blogger.com , the correct price may be 900k (leasehold til 2052), even though the Trump Tower next door was sold out for 10-20 mil (freehold) a piece [lease hold can be converted to freehold at reasonable price]

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next