Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: ManyMoose who wrote (62235)	9/4/2007 6:56:10 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) of 90947

A friend built one for about 90,000 (1200 sq. ft.) plus about 20,000 for the inground heating pad. We intend to look into all the eco friendly solutions available as it is somewhat of a project. Will probably use water runoff and cistern rather than digging well as some up there have spent 20,000 plus on the quest for well water. We could use ozone treatment. Right off the bat a round home is about 15% more energy efficient per sq. ft., or so I am told. Would certainly cost more than conventional to build, but costs could be recouped over time. Here is the supplier she used: mandalahomes.com Here is an inside photo: mandalahomes.com 10 minutes spent browsing the site will give a good intro to the concept. The "photos" tab has a bunch of photos with access arrows underneath... mandalahomes.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next