Advanced Micro vs Intel (AMD / INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro vs Intel (AMD / INTC)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: mas_ who wrote (2359)	9/10/2007 11:42:25 PM
From: dougSF30	Read Replies (2) of 2596

Also only 2.3 was promised No, mas. They promised faster parts in the many OEM roadmaps they sent out. "2.3 and above" on their slides. A "rapid ramp" of frequency in public. the difference between 2.5 and 2.6 is just noise and 2.6 was only ever a projection They were bragging about 2.6 benchmark scores early this year! And what ever happened to your 2.8GHz 95W parts? 2.5 GHz will kill Clovertown in so many benches Uh, Sharikou, don't get upset, but by December, Harpertown will have been out for a month, along with the Seaburg and San Clemente platforms. :) Meanwhile, AMD will have made no progress from the samples they benched 3 months early. It was from the webcast And did he or anyone else say if ANYTHING over 2GHz can be expected before December?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next