SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (349799)9/11/2007 1:54:11 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) of 1575037
 
It isn't. Look again at the numbers. In 2006, there were 36.5 million people in poverty. That's the figure that translates into the 12.3 percent poverty rate. In 1990, the population was smaller, and there were 33.6 million people in poverty, a rate of 13.5 percent. The increase from 1990 to 2006 was 2.9 million people (36.5 million minus 33.6 million). Hispanics accounted for all of the gain.

This is just another example of rightie number manipulation. Poverty levels went down during the 1990s but have been rising ever since Bush took over. So all that had been gained during the '90s has been lost plus 2.9 million more. Isn't that grand?!

As for immigration, current immigrants are the wealthiest in this country's history. So I doubt they are the problem. As for illegals, I don't know how the data is collected but I doubt they are being counted......at least not very much. One of the major complaints by cities is that illegals are vastly undercounted during the population census done every ten years.

See, Tim, how your guys play with the numbers to make it seem like the left is nuts. That's to insure you keep drinking the koolaid.

Cheers!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext