Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (219439)	9/12/2007 11:06:42 AM
From: ahhaha	Read Replies (1) of 793801

At the end of it, Turkey siezes Kurdistan, Syria and Saudi Arabia seize Sunni Iraq, and Iran takes control of the rest - filling the power vacuum, as President Ahmedinijad promised. I suggest that none of the regional powers would do anything, rather, Al Qaeda would turn Iraq into another Afghanistan. Saudi Arabia wouldn't make any move since they're small and unstable. Syria is frozen since any move by them invites Turkish confrontation independently of an Al Qaeda take over. Whether Turkey seizes areas in north Iraq is somewhat inconsequential since it doesn't disturb Al Qaeda's plans. Initially, Iran would make no move, but would aid and abet Al Qaeda's preparation for launching new strikes against the West and the Great Sataaaan. The bigger question is what happens to Iraq's oil when all the oil production skill flees. The bordering nations have to worry about their own internal security when AL Qaeda takes over. Eventually, Israel, who isn't constrained by defeatists, would have to nuclear bomb most of Iraq and Iran. Turn the place into glass.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next