SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Azenta
AZTA 29.28-4.2%11:56 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: The Ox who wrote (899)9/13/2007 9:42:29 AM
From: EACarl  Read Replies (1) of 1138
 
Hi OX, let me try this again as our numbers still do not agree:
RE "At a $150MM per quarter revenue run rate, the price to sales ratio for a $7 stock with 70MM shares outstanding would actually be 1.22 and not the 0.25 you are suggesting.

EDIT ( I see my error: actually the P/S would be 0.81 NOT 1.22 but the point is still the same )"

I'm taking net cash per share OUT of the stock price because we know $4 per share in cash is worth $4 per share to the stock price AND is not generating sales. So GS $7 target means they value BRKS (the operations of the company - which include the sales) at $3 per share. Now if we use your $150 million "Q" run rate that's $600 million per year divided by the shares after the buyback of ~64 million, that's $9.375 in sales per share. Then take the $3 ($7 GS target less $4 net cash) divided by $9.375 (your forward annualized sales) = .32 Price to sales. Again my point is that there comes a point where a stock gets valued by means other than P/E, and the above is why I think GS target using P/E is one of them.

NOTE: the difference in my previous post and this post in (let's call is P/S adjusted for net cash) is because I was using TTM sales last time vs. Your estimated forward sales rate this time.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext