SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : 2000 Date-Change Problem: Scam, Hype, Hoax, Fraud

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (281)10/8/1997 11:49:00 AM
From: David Eddy   of 1361
 
Jeff,

FYI, dBase, from day one, always had a "date" data type that stored dates as characters with 4 digit years. If you add "Set Century On" to your code you are instantly Y2K data entry/displaycompliant.

I've used two of the multitude of xBase clones & was well pleased with how easy they were to use... & how easy it would be to take shortcuts because you didn't know any better and you were in a hurry and because this was just a quick 'n' dirty temporary sort of thing.

The way I look at it, a computer language is a computer language is a computer language & it makes no difference whatsoever what platform it runs on. When the bean counters sit down & do the math... "let's see: 2,000,000 records that are just 10 bytes shorter--only 5 dates--and you save 20MB"

Anyone old enough here to remember when a 20MB disk on a PC cost real money? I had to pay US$800 in 1987 to upgrade from 10MB to 20MB on my 19lb Toshiba luggable. Somehow I was unable to factor in that bys 1997 a 1.2GB disk is under US$300 retail, quantity one.

I think I speak for many when I say I'd sooner pull out dandelions in my yard than remediate old dBase code.

Whimp! <g>

David
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext