SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brumar89 who wrote (350594)9/14/2007 2:58:39 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) of 1586426
 
re: You keep "moving the goalposts."

No I don't. A "haven fot terrorists" implies a lot of terrorist, not one.

re: While there are plenty of terrorists in Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and even in the US (and many many other countries), the issue involved in a country being a "haven for terrorists" is whether the government of the country explicitly allows them to operate legally in their territory and protects them.

So when are you going to prove that Saddam Hussein "allows them to operate legally in their territory and protects them"?

Since there were so many more terrorists in SA, Pak and Egypt then the logical assumption would be that they were much more "havens for terrorists".

And if there are more terrorists in the US than in Iraq the implication is that the US is more of a haven for terrorists than Iraq was.

You are at your wits end Bummer, give it up.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News