SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brumar89 who wrote (350610)9/15/2007 8:10:19 AM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) of 1586428
 
Bumman,

re: "not just one" And I named several who were there with their groups.

Four and you can't prove it. We killed 3800 of our troops and spent a half trillion dollars to get four low lifes?

re: don't have to "prove" that (it would take my possession of internal Saddam regime documents to prove that and you wouldn't accept even that). The fact that Saddam ran a Stalinist state is evidence enough.

It's your contention (against all common knowledge) that Iraq was a "haven for terrorists". This is your definition:

"the issue involved in a country being a "haven for terrorists" is whether the government of the country explicitly allows them to operate legally in their territory and protects them."

So if you claim the wacky notion that Iraq was a "haven for terrorists" then you have to prove Saddam "protected" them.

You fringe wacko neos crack me up. God knows what else goes on in that little mind of yours.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News