THE WHITE HOUSE Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE

SPY 687.01

-0.1%

Dec 30 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: JDN who wrote (8764)	9/16/2007 9:33:34 AM
From: Jim S	Read Replies (1) of 25737

As a fellow gun owner, your attitude worries me. A federal requirement for using gun locks? How about a national police force to enforce the gun lock requirement? I don't agree with the expensive and bureaucratic laws about ownership of fully auto guns, but since they're priced out of my reach, I can live with the existing rules. Just about anyone with $500 for the license can buy a machine gun, so it really isn't about restricting ownership as much as paying taxes for the enjoyment of such ownership. Same thing for so-called sawed off shotguns and silencers -- it isn't that you can't have them, it's that you have to pay a tax and go through bureaucratic hoops for legal ownership. It's clear to me that Rudy doesn't care much for the 2nd, and would sign any restrictive bill that happened to be currently popular. I could never support him for that reason.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next