“there is evidently a requirement to believe that every element, the entire scope of what is called the "official" story is fabricated. Anything short of not adhering to the MIHOP/LIHOP tale is heresy....”
Hi 2.718...
I have finally figured you out and I am impressed with your creativity and brilliance.
You fooled me for a while, but now I see what you are doing, and I have to admit that I am humbled. You have actually hit upon an effective tool to advance our side.
What I figured out is that you are one of us -- a LIHOP person or maybe a MIHOP person.
As such, as one of us, you know that the government’s assertion that 19 Arabs walked out of a cave, hijacked four commercial jets and outwitted the entire North American air defense system is ridiculous. But you also understand that most people believe in government, and you know very well that these people cannot be shaken from their belief by facts linked together with cogent argument.
You have decided to take a different approach. You have decided to defend the government’s position but with argument filled with sophomoric assertions. (E.g.: there is evidently a requirement that....” a good phrase, and funny too, in the light of no evidence offered to support the adverb, “evidently?”).
Even better, you dare transgress a basic laws of logic, the law of non-contradiction. “Anything short of not adhering to the MIHOP/LIHOP tale is heresy.” This is a brilliant stroke, since obviously the two theories are mutually exclusive (If one believes in MIHOP then one cannot believe in LIHOP.)
Only an illiterate would string words together like this --- OR somebody like you, a clever person, who in the guise of attacking B in order to defend A actually is knocking down A in order to establish B.
Brilliant. Keep up the good work.
|
