Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: c.hinton who wrote (242030)	9/17/2007 12:21:39 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (2) of 281500

so you wont use containment and deterrence for iran. You are against use of force under any circumstances. So what is your policy then---only one word comes to mind and that is appeasement. I hate to use it on you but apparently you are ready, willing and able to trust ahmadijad with nukes. Most sane folks arent. I lump you with america haters like chumpsky and noeleon because of this very fact. You would rather see the west fail than be tough here. You trust your future and your kids future in ahamdijads hands more than bush and after bush more than any other american leader or even france. Question for you? What if it was bin laden obtaining nukes. Would you be just as sanguine when bending over for him? Should we in general just appease bin laden too and pray that they will be satisifed with what they win in the mideast and wont bother us in the west???? Wake up Man.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next