Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (351224)	9/20/2007 1:44:06 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) of 1578057

re: Why should any state have to pay for their own highways then? Most major projects are a combination of either State and Federal, or County and Federal funds. The Feds are essentially returning money to the state (paid by the state's taxpayers) when they participate with a local DOT. You can argue that it doesn't make any sense for the Feds to tax and then return the money... and there is something to that. But there are different jurisdictions... state, county and federal, that benefit from functional improvements in the road system. just because you live in California it doesn't mean that at times you won't benefit from improvements in Nevada's road system. For instance when something arrives in California by truck. Just meant as an explanation... not in any way political.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next