SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE
SPY 678.85-0.3%4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sedohr Nod who wrote (8749)9/21/2007 1:14:11 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) of 25737
 
Re: "The problem is not always how the math adds up, buddy. If the world and mankind ran on pure logic, the Japanese would not have attempted to set the whole of the Pacific-rim on fire in the WWII era....math clearly was not on their side..."

Absolutely correct, Don.

The Japanese (and Germany, too, for that matter) were seriously out-classed by the ECONOMIC/MILITARY potentials of their combined enemies in the Great War.

(Something their military leadership --- especially the Admiralty --- was very much aware of before the commencement of hostilities.)

And, (obviously) the odds favoring the US and her Allies played out true. (And, to this day, I would say that WW II remains the *best* example of the fact that modern 'total war' is DEPENDENT upon the economic bases that feed the military potentials of the combatants.)

Still, it *is* possible for shorter odds to come up 'winners' every now and again.

Even in the Great War, a few rolls of the dice coming up with different numbers at Midway (and, say, Hitler not over-ruling his General Staff all the time, and mucking-up Dunkirk and the entire Russian campaign...) might have produced quite different outcomes.

Don't you think?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext