A US National Health Care System? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TimF who wrote (2093)	9/21/2007 4:25:53 PM
From: Mary Cluney	Read Replies (2) of 42652

<<<You didn't get more specific you got more general and vague. What points about the program do you like, what do you think the results will be?>>> My main point is that whenever you design a system, or change a system, there are always tradeoffs that you have to make. Any systems design has to favor one function over another or one group over another. You make a car go as fast as you can, gas mileage has to suffer. You make a car as pretty as you can, the costs go up. You make a car as expensive as you can, less people can afford to buy it. When you design a healthcare system that favors the rich (load it with super expensive options) the health care of the poor will deteriorate. What you have to do is be practical. You have to make the proper tradeoffs so that you can maximize the benefits for opposing or contending interests. One big reason I favor Hillary's proposal is that I think she understands this concept. She has had real time hands on experience in tackling this problem. There is not need for me to rehash the details of her propsal. Go to her website and read all about it.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next