Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: unclewest who wrote (221037)	9/24/2007 12:06:33 PM
From: KLP	Read Replies (3) of 793953

I hadn't realized the Generals took out the SF....That makes no sense.... WHY? I'm certainly not doubting you, but simply asking why? Was that a military decision, or a political one? It was also working beautifully in Afghanistan before the conventional generals got there and started screwing things up. It also worked in Northern Iraq until SF was replaced there by conventional troops. And one more question....For every fighting soldier we have in theater, how many others does it take to support him/her? And I am assuming these numbers are included in the total fighting strength of our soldiers....right? If for instance, the ratio is 1 soldier with 3 others to support...then out of 100,000, we would really have only 25,000 to do the fighting ...??

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next