SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jim McMannis who wrote (90268)9/24/2007 12:25:31 PM
From: Lizzie TudorRead Replies (2) of 306849
 
the thing is Jim, the "illegals problem" (I think everybody agrees there is a problem) is not a partisan issue as it stands right now. So in terms of digging Hillary with it, it just doesn't make sense thats the point.

The republicans that supported Bush's abortive immigration policy (which he has pushed for years btw) supported it as just more pork (non cash pork) for the business lobby. Businesses want cheap labor, why not? And Bush is the pawn of business no matter what the cost to the USA. Bush is also for dumping any sort of workplace safety laws and all kinds of other BS, and immigration is one more component of it. Thats Bush's agenda with immigration.

On the dem side its a little less clear to me why they push for immigration, I guess to get more voters since immigrants will likely vote Dem.

So there you have it, 2 parties with 2 pathetic agendas when it comes to illegals, something that US citizens have REPEATEDLY said they do not support. The problem is, this is non partisan. There is nothing about Hillary's position on illegals that makes her more of an amnesty supporter than anybody else. Hillary doesn't stand up at a SOTU address and make illegal amnesty a KEY PLANK for the year- Bush did that.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext