Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: tejek who wrote (15632)	9/25/2007 10:27:33 AM
From: Ann Corrigan	Read Replies (2) of 224737

Many respected scientists also refute much of the data compiled by their peers. It's a complicated issue with many considerations including the fact there's a financial advantage to prominent supporters like the weather guru, Al Gore. Possibly if he had more credibility in general, the skeptics of global warming hysteria would be more compelled to believe the chicken little types. That said, agreed that it would be beneficial for the US to reduce consumption of fossil fuels; however the primary reason would be to encourage development of alternative energy in order to break US dependence on MidEast oil. An example of other periods of panic over changing weather patterns--Europe in the early 1800s was so cold, it's referred to as the "little ice age." >many respected scientists have concluded that there may be a strong possibility that the earth is experiencing global warming, and that Man may very well be the culprit. Assuming that that might be the case, they are suggesting we take steps to mitigate the effect and reduce our consumption of fossil fuels.<

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next