SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: pcyhuang who wrote (28326)9/30/2007 10:43:31 PM
From: Paul Senior  Read Replies (1) of 78464
 
Nah, you don't get it, pcyhuang. Turn your focus to "substantial ETFC account" and risk therewith.

There are some people here who have a substantial ETFC brokerage account. For you to post that a few people here cannot understand your buy recommendation fails to take this into consideration. Imo.

Anybody who has a substantial account at ETFC ought to consider ETFC puts, if anything. (And getting them from another broker.)
If they buy ETFC stock on your recommendation/analysis, they are taking a dangerous road. Jmo.

Here's the key for you: If you had a "substantial" brokerage account at E-trade, for how much are you insured (SIPC, etc.), and for how much are you NOT insured? For a few here where substantial is Substanial, my opinion is they had better try to wrestle with this than add to their risk by buying ETFC stock. I am guessing they might believe the same. Again, jmo.

---
And of course, as this is supposed to be the Ben Graham value thread, "looking at the charts" supposedly would not be a key to making a purchase decision.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext