That's just stupid. They elected the government and have the most representative government that they have ever had, but they voted for the puppet version? There were a number of candidates on the ballot, and any Iraqi could run. So.....why do you call it a puppet government, just because the US military was in the country? Is that it?
Under Saddam there were representations, yet no one was allowed to contradict the regime. You see the same thing today, however, you can can not contradict the US. The US pushed policies and laws that protect its interests, not the Iraqis interests.
The Iraqis who choose to kill other Iraqis rather than build a business are making that choice, and are responsible for the repurcussions of that choice. That has nothing to do with peep holes or Gaza, that's just admitting that Iraqi insurgents are humans like you and me, and they are responsible for the decisions they make in their life, as are you and I in ours.
An outsider casting judgment on a situation that you have no interest in.
No, I'm talking about the entire creation of the country. If it weren't protected by the British from 1900-1971, the Saudis would have annexed the land, subjugated the locals, kpet the oil for their royal family, and it would be a part of Saudi Arabia from about 1950 on. There would be no such things as the UAE. The only reason it exists is due to foreign British influence. So if you think Dubai is a nice place, thank England for stopping the Saudis from screwing it up.
Hmmm thanks for proving my point. The local asked for outside help it was not shoved down their throats. |
