SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (91010)10/1/2007 4:38:06 PM
From: neolibRead Replies (1) of 306849
 
You do make a mistake in assuming all wealth must be monetized with an equal amount of money. There must be enough money to provide for the needs of savings and exchange, which is a small percentage of a society's total wealth.

Yes, I know that the == amount is higher than needed, but I was actually pulling that from a comment in your post which implied that was what you thought. I might have misread that. The question is do people even agree on what the amount should be?

I want to clarify one other thing: Are not the non-monetarists a very small segment of economists these days?

BTW, in my island script, I should have shown a track for money creation prior to credit creation. I.e.

1) Barter goods having use aside from intrinsic value i.e. most any goods or services.

2) Selection of a small set or a single item, having such use, but somehow also suited as a standard for exchange (coconuts?) because of uniformity, longevity, etc.

3) Transition to something of intrinsic value, but not much other use, i.e. baubles of some sort.

4) Adoption of anti-forgery methods and other means of regulating the supply of these baubles which have basically no use besides being money.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext