SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Road Walker who wrote (353387)10/3/2007 11:30:08 AM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) of 1575875
 
There are hundreds of millions of guns in the US, hundreds of millions more outside the US. Some of them are old and still very functional. Outlaw manufacture and you have more incentive to keep the current ones functional, or to repair old ones. Also relatively primitive guns can be built without advanced or large scale manufacturing technology.

As for bullets, many people reload themselves. Make bullets harder to get and that will only increase.

Of course you can confiscate guns, bullets, reloading equipment etc., but I don't see any reason to think that will be more effective than trying to shut out drugs.

In fact it may be less successful. Drug users need to get new drugs, heavy and/or addicted users need them on a regular basis. Guns and bullets can last a long time. You don't need a new "fix" every day or every week, or every decade for that matter.

But then at the end you say we agree, so I guess you where just playing devils advocate. Nothing wrong with that
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext