SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc.
AAPL 257.69-0.9%2:44 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: slacker711 who wrote (69593)10/3/2007 3:15:01 PM
From: inaflash  Read Replies (1) of 213182
 
I'm one of those that's complaining about the video out issue, but besides Apple's greediness, there are some copyright issues that need to be played out. Similar with ringtones.

Apple totally at fault: "iPod touch Screen Problems: Deny Them, Charge Restocking Fees"
Solution: Fix the damn problem and move on.

Apple somewhat at fault: "iTunes Store iPod Games: Buy Them Again for New iPods"
Solution: Depends on what one believes is Apple's responsibility in backwards compatibility. Folks bought the games for then current devices. Hope, but not promise of future device compatibility is helpful, but not guaranteed. How many programs got free updates/upgrades to intel processors? As programs migrate from OS X version to version? Usually programs migrate versions as well and some improvements justify the addons. So Apple should just make some improvements, add some levels to the games, and offer past buyers an upgrade path. Split the difference as most software programs have done lately.

Apple appers at fault, but possibly deeper issue: "Apple Breaks 2005-2007 Video Add-Ons: No Warning, Just Buy New Ones" and "iPhone Ringtones: Pay Twice for Each Song; Forget Using Your Own"
Solution: There are significant copyright laws that are being defined. I've read this a couple of times and still can't make heads or tails of the matter: Ringtone Decision
copyright.gov
I think Apple is being conservative about the interpretation so it doesn't expose itself to undue liability. Same goes for the video restriction. In working in a hardware solution, it could be possible to gain industry support like Macrovision. Beyond the Betamax decision, there hasn't been that many victories for fair use, plus there's no telling that the Betamax decision couldn't be revisited and revised if the right cases and courts decide to act or legislative action is taken. With Jobs having a vested interest in both the devices and technology (through Apple) and content (thru Disney), he's in unique position to see the compromises necessary to move things forwards.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext