Searle,
The Bilderberg.org website is not run by the Bilderberg Group. It's run by someone with the goal of tracking them I suppose.
I think you're mentioned on there because those that run the site followed the path of the Dr. Kelly incident to the Bilderberg Group. It's not hard to do.
Blair may have vacated 10 Downing St. but if the group, of which you can be sure he is still a member, finds benefit to any services he might be able to provide them I'm sure he wouldn't hesitate to do so. Or if he developed an initiative for the benefit of the group or any combination of individuals within the group he would certainly offer it. Maybe writing a position paper on a subject on which his name would lend credence that could then be waved around in a propagandistic drive to justify a policy ready to be implemented somewhere.
"That's why I believe the REAL decisions are made elsewhere, in secret and not by a whole crowd."
I don't believe the "whole crowd" of them is involved in most decisions. The whole crowd is generally in agreement on the direction in which they want to take the world. But when it comes to an initiative involving, for example, mining in Indonesia, then only those members (a subgroup) involved with that aspect make decisions...in congruence with the generally shared overall goal.
Each of the members has a rather large slice of wealth and power. To keep that slice and expand it is the goal of each individual and the framework within which to do it is already set and agreed upon by the group. If someone someone acquired enough wealth and power outside the group, they would be approached and asked to join. The condition being that the prospective newcomer must agree to operate within the group's already set framework and also not to publicize it. If he/she did not agree, he/she would find their efforts to accumulate more wealth and power while remaining outside would cease or be reversed.
The group does not have to decide every day which way they will direct the world. That's already been decided and is inherent in the group's structure so there's no reason for the "whole crowd" to operate as one organ in every action taken by any individuals or combination of individuals.
If Dr. Kelly was a threat to the members of the sub-group responsible for the illegal invasion of Iraq (a rather large sub-group I'd say) it wouldn't take the entire Bilderberg Group to mobilize against him and cover it all up. All it would take is Blair and maybe a couple others (another, very small, subgroup). The actual deed done by somebody unconnected to the group to whom the identity of where the impetus lay or even why was not necessarily known.
And yes, I do think they are a lot like the Mafia...on a much, much grander scale. The Mafia uses thugs and hoods...these people do too but they also use armies, the CIA, MI6, the NSA, all major media and the other tools we discussed as well as the ones Kennedy pointed out.
If Dr. Kelly had been seriously threatening some Mafia don's gambling empire the result wouldn't have been much different. Kelly would be dead. One difference might be that the incident wouldn't have been covered over so neatly. The Mafia might have gotten rid of the body but the people who had him killed knew they didn't have to even worry about that. They control the investigation and the story.
And as a side note, Kennedy planned to break the CIA, withdraw from Viet Nam, dismantle the Federal Reserve system THEN he publically declared himself an enemy to the very people we're talking about while bringing them closer to the light of day. He was clearly a threat.
They were well-organized and very powerful 45 years ago. That's a lot of time to become even more powerful and more organized. After Kennedy, Dr. Kelly was just a very tiny thing for them. |
