kirk said:
<<I will continue to point out who is making false statements here about Brinker and his critics as it goes to their credibility when they make up false statements about his such as O's recent "fabrication" that Brinker crushed the markets since 1991.>>
queen responded:
<<Personally, I will continue to ask questions and examine unsubstantiated comments when I think it might be appropriate, ok? That's not the same as accusing someone of making false statements, BTW.
And who is "O"?>>
--That would be me, queen. I guess "stockie" for stalkalot is a personal attack, but "O" for Octavian is fine and dandy. -:)
A while back I made the statement that brinker's P1 had crushed the market since 1991. Kirk, of course, called me a liar.
I explained that I was going by info math had posted previously. Math then responded that Brinker had indeed beaten the market by a huge margin from , I believe, 2000 through 2006. I think he said 3 to 1--he tripled the market return!
What I had done in my own mind when reading that was extrapolate that he also must have crushed the market from 1991 to the present, since he was bullish all of that time and was pretty heavily into tech.
So, I guess technically I was "fabricating" (actually, I was just going from memory). But I think the extrapolation is fair and no doubt accurate, don't you?
Kirk certainly hasn't posted any info to show that I was wrong.
I mean, if Bob crushed the market (including Q's, by the way) from 2000 to 2006, don't you think it's fair to assume he also crushed it from 1991-2006?
But kirk won't let go. He's determined to try to convince the people on his side that I am a liar.
It's going to be quite a trick if he can do that, since I have never, not once, lied on a brinker message board, and since he has yet to offer a SINGLE example of one of my supposed lies. |
