Mark Levin was all over that tonight!! Waxman AND his staff had better be afraid.....very afraid. All pipsqueek --all 5 foot and 5 inches of him.....Tonight, Levin was in the best form I've ever heard him. He was Hot! But he was very cool, and collected when he spoke. In part, he mentioned this....There WILL be more, for sure!
Waxman evidently forgets there are SIGNED contracts, a private business, and Free Speech, all of which Levin reminded his 4 MILLION+ listeners, as well as Waxman and his staff....If his staff does as he demands, they will be involved as well....
There are many references to Tortuous Interference....here's two.....
7. TORTUOUS INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACT
commercial-litigation-lawyer.com
In order to establish a claim for Tortuous Interference with Contract, six elements must usually be established:
A valid existing contract;
That defendant had knowledge of;
That defendant intended to induce breach of;
That the contract was in fact breached or performance was rendered more difficult;
Causation; and
Actual damage.
888888888888888 **************** 888888888888888888 ***********
>>>>>>>>>>>It should be becoming clear now that anonymous sources of information present a problem for everyone. What about those who make it their business to remove, from others, a level of anonymity the law protects; their privacy? This subject will be explored in the next section.
oracle-training.cc
Tortuous Interference
Tortuous interference is the unlawful interference into one’s contractual or business affairs. For example, someone who uses the web to defame an individual’s business and contacts their customers (or prospective customers) may be violating this law. A special case of tortuous interference called “Tortuous Interference with Prospective Advantage” is available in some states to punish those who seek to damage one’s ability to find and retain new customers.
The elements of the tort of interference with contract are:
A valid contract between the plaintiff and a third person that confers upon plaintiff a contractual right against a third person.
The defendant knows of the contract.
The defendant intentionally induces the third person not to perform the contract.
The defendant acts without justification.
The defendant’s conduct causes actual pecuniary harm to the plaintiff.
|
